*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
A no-break
power system is installed and regularly tested
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Potential
availability risks are proactively detected and addressed
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Critical
infrastructure components are identified and continuously monitored
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Continuous
service provision is a continuum of advance capacity planning,
acquisition of high-availability components, needed redundancy,
existence of tested contingency plans and the removal of single
points of failure
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Action is
taken on the lessons learned from actual downtime incidents and
test executions of contingency plans
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Availability
requirements analysis is performed regularly
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Service level
agreements are used to raise awareness and increase co-operation
with suppliers for continuity needs
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
The escalation
process is clearly understood and based on a classification of
availability incidents
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
The business
costs of interrupted service are specified and quantified where
possible, providing the motivation to develop appropriate plans
and arrange for contingency facilities
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
*
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
*
KEY
GOAL INDICATORS
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
No incidents
causing public embarrassment
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Number of
critical business processes relying on IT that have adequate continuity
plans
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Regular and
formal proof that the continuity plans work
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Reduced downtime
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Number of
critical infrastructure components with automatic availability
monitoring
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
*
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
*
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
*
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
*
KEY
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Number of
outstanding continuous service issues not resolved or addressed
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Number and
extent of breaches of continuous service, using duration and impact
criteria
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Time lag
between organisational change and continuity plan update
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Time to diagnose
an incident and decide on continuity plan execution
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Time to normalise
the service level after execution of the continuity plan
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Number of
proactive availability fixes implemented
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Lead time
to address continuous service short-falls
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Frequency
of continuous service training provided
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
Frequency
of continuous service testing
*
unknown
inadequate
acceptable
good
*